Document Markup
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/strict.dtd">
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<link rel ="shortcut icon" href="images/favicon.ico">
<link rel ="icon" href="images/favicon.ico">
<title>Stereoisomer prefixes for amino acids and sugars</title>
<LINK REL=StyleSheet HREF="style.css" TYPE="text/css" MEDIA=all>
<style type="text/css" media="screen" title="Red background">
<!--
p.shout {
background: yellow;
color: #3333cc;
margin: 2em 12px 0 12px;
padding: 4px 3px 4px 3px;
}
-->
</style>
<meta name="description" content="A basic biochemical mistake that frequently occur in standard textbooks">
<meta name="keywords" content="biochemistry, mistakes, howlers, stereoisomers, enantiomers, sugars, amino acids">
<link rel=home href="homepage.htm" title="Home page">
<link rel=next href="liverhk.htm" title="Next page in this series">
<link rel=last href="choles.htm" title="Last page in this series">
<link rel=up href="howler0.htm" title="Parent page in the hierarchy">
<link rel=copyright href="copy.htm" title="Copyright information">
<link rel=help href="help.htm" title="Navigation help">
<link rel=author href="mailto:acornish@ibsm.cnrs-mrs.fr" title="Email the author">
</head>
<body>
<form METHOD=POST ACTION="http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbw.cgi">
<table class="searchform">
<tr><td class="searchform" align="left"><a name="top"></a>
<a accesskey="S" href="howler0.htm">Howlers</a> >
<span title="You are here">Stereoisomer prefixes
</span></td>
<td class="searchform" align="right">
<input type=text name="Gw" SIZE="35" MAXLENGTH="225">
<input type="submit" value="Search">
<p class="invisible"><a href="homepage.htm" accesskey="H"> </a>
<input type=hidden name="n" value="5">
<input type=hidden name="d" value="http://bip.cnrs-mrs.fr/bip10/">
</td></tr></table>
</form>
<h1 class="top">Confusion about the prefixes <small>D</small>- and <small>L</small>-</h1>
<p class="header">This page discusses the use of the stereochemical prefixes
D- and L- in biochemistry and is one of a series that discuss
common errors in current textbooks of biochemistry.</p>
<p class="shout"><br>All of the pages in this series are in <strong>urgent need of updating.</strong>
The biochemical principles have not changed, of course, but textbooks have: some of
those that were current when I first prepared these pages in 2000 have appeared in new editions, and
others have ceased to be widely used. New books have appeared that are not discussed. Unfortunately
I do not have easy access to any of the commonly used textbooks, as I work in a research (not teaching)
environment in a country where English is not the everyday working language. I could buy them, of course,
but that would represent rather a large investment for the sake of a few web pages.<br><br>Accordingly
I should be grateful if someone would collaborate with me in the revision. If you have access to
all of the textbooks published in English in the past ten years (say 1996 or later)
that are commonly used for teaching biochemistry, and if you would like to
help, please contact me at acornish@ibsm.cnrs-mrs.fr.
<h2 class="framed">An example of the problem</h2>
<div class="sidebar-medium">
<p class="in-sidebar"><strong>Other errors</strong><br>
<p class="in-sidebar"><a href="liverhk0.htm">Liver hexokinase</a>
<p class="in-sidebar"><a href="asympt.htm">Michaelis–Menten kinetics</a>
<p class="in-sidebar"><a href="effic0.htm">Metabolic <q>efficiency</q></a>
<p class="in-sidebar"><a href="zwitter.htm">Uncharged amino acids</a>
<p class="in-sidebar"><a href="rls0.htm">Control of glycolysis</a>
<p class="in-sidebar"><a href="glycogen0.htm">Structure of glycogen</a>
<p class="in-sidebar"><a href="choles.htm">Plant cholesterol</a>
</div>
<p><a href="howler.htm#campbell">Campbell,</a> pp. 69–70:
<p class="quotation">
The two possible stereoisomers of another chiral compound, <small>L</small>- and
<small>D</small>-glyceraldehyde, are shown for comparison with the corresponding forms of alanine. These two forms of glyceraldehyde are the basis of the classification of amino acids into <small>L</small> and
<small>D</small> forms. The terminology comes
from the Latin <i>laevus</i> and <i>dexter,</i> meaning <q>left</q> and <q>right,</q> respectively. The two stereoisomers of each amino acid are designated as <b><small>L</small> and
<small>D</small> amino acids</b> on the basis of their similarity to the glyceraldehyde standard. In the <small>L</small> form of
glyceraldehyde the hydroxyl group is on the left side of the molecule, and in the <small>D</small> form it is on the right side,
as shown in perspective in Figure 3.3 (a Fischer projection). In an amino acid, the position of the amino group on the left or right side of the
*gkalpha carbon determines the <small>L</small> or
<small>D</small> designation. The amino acids that occur in proteins are all
of the <small>L</small> form.
</p>
<p><a name="above"></a>After a giving a correct account of the <i>(RS)</i> system often used in natural products
chemistry, <a href="howler.htm#mathews">Mathews, van Holde and Ahern</a> (p. 281)
give the following explanation of why it is little used by biochemists:
<p class="quotation">
Although the <i>R–S</i> convention is more general, it is little used by biochemists. It becomes
difficult to apply in the common situation in which a molecule contains more than one asymmetric
carbon atom.
</p>
<h2 class="framed">The stereochemical principles involved</h2>
<p>In the early days of stereochemistry the only relevant property that could easily be measured was optical activity,
i.e. the capacity to rotate the plane of polarized light clockwise or
anticlockwise. These were called dextrorotatory and laevorotatory respectively, and represented by the prefixes
d- and l- respectively (<strong>Note.</strong> Lower-case letters, not <small>D</small> and
<small>L</small>). Ordinary glucose, for example, is dextrorotatory and is thus d-glucose, whereas ordinary fructose is laevorotatory and
is thus l-fructose, and these two sugars are sometimes called dextrose and laevulose respectively to reflect their
optical properties.
<p>It was later realized that opposite
optical activity meant opposite (mirror-image) arrangement of the atoms in space, or <em>configuration.</em>
However, only very much later did it become technically
possible to determine this arrangement—i.e. for a long time it was known that the two forms of lactic acid were
mirror images of one another but there was no way of knowing which was which.
<p>During this long period, chemical methods were developed that allowed different molecules to
be related seterochemically to one another. So,
for example, although there was no way of knowing the actual arrangement of atoms around the asymmetric carbon atoms in
serine and alanine obtained by protein hydrolysis, it <em>was</em>
possible to deduce to deduce that both of these amino acids (as well as all the other asymmetric amino acids obtained
by protein hydrolysis) had the <em>same</em> configuration. Thus if the configuration of natural serine was <em>defined</em>
as <small>L</small> it followed that all the others were <small>L</small> as well. It is more complicated for the hexoses, including
glucose and fructose, because
each of these contains several asymmetric carbon atoms. However, similar experiments to relate the sugars to one another showed that
although there were variations at some of the asymmetric atoms, the configuration at C5 was always the same. d-Glucose (optical symbol) was
then <em>defined</em> as <small>D</small>-glucose (configuration symbol), which meant that l-fructose was also <small>D</small>-fructose.
<p>Not surprisingly, this system of symbols led to confusion, and in consequence the old d- and l- prefixes have been <em>abandoned.</em> You
should never see them except in very old textbooks or historical accounts. In modern usage they are replaced by (+) for d, and (-) for l. The
modern symbols are not common in biochemical sources because biochemists are not often interested in the polarizing properties of
molecules. By contrast, they are quite often interested in the configurations of molecules, i.e. the arrangements of atoms around a chiral atom,
and so the configurational prefixes <small>D</small> and <small>L</small> are in common use. More important, biochemists frequently deal
with series of related molecules, the amino acids, for example, or the hexoses. They need, therefore, symbols that express in a clear way
whether two related molecules have the same or different configurations. When chemists work with the same sorts of molecules they have
the same requirements, and they also continue to use <small>D</small> and <small>L</small>.
<p>The terms dextrorotatory and laevorotatory refer to an optical property
that can be observed and measured without any knowledge of the detailed molecular structure. The
modern configurational symbols <small>D</small> and <small>L</small> echo their historical
origins in measurements of optical rotations, but they have no clear relationship to the normal
meanings of right and left. Even though it is of course possible to represent a molecule on paper
in such a way that a particular group is on the left or the right, the actual molecule in three
dimensions has no <q>left</q> or <q>right</q> side except in relation to some arbitrary convention.
<p>In addition, however, chemists often need to define a configuration unambiguously in the absence of any reference compound, and for this
purpose the alternative <i>(R,S)</i> system is ideal, as it uses priority rules to specify configurations. These rules sometimes lead to absurd results
when they are applied to biochemical molecules. For example, as we have seen, all of the common amino acids are <small>L</small>, because they
all have exactly the same structure, including the position of the R group if we just write the R group as R. However, they do not all
have the same configuration in the <i>(R,S)</i> system: <small>L</small>-cysteine is also <i>(R)</i>-cysteine, but all the other <small>L</small>-amino
acids are <i>(S).</i> However, this just reflects the human decision to give a sulphur atom higher priority than a carbon atom, and does not reflect
a real difference in configuration. Worse problems can sometimes arise in substitution reactions: sometimes inversion of configuration can result
in <em>no change</em> in the <i>(R)</i> or <i>(S)</i> prefix; and sometimes retention of configuration can result in a change of prefix.
<p>It follows that it is not just conservatism or failure to understand the <i>(R,S)</i> system that causes biochemists to continue with <small>D</small>
and <small>L</small>: it is just that the <small>DL</small> system fulfils their needs much better. As mentioned, chemists also use <small>D</small>
and <small>L</small> when they are appropriate to their needs. The <q>explanation</q> given <a href=
"#above">above</a> by <a href="howler.htm#mathews">Mathews, van Holde and Ahern</a>
of why the <i>(R,S)</i> system is little used in biochemistry is thus almost the exact opposite
of reality. This system is actually the only practical way of unambiguously representing the
stereochemistry of complicated molecules with several asymmetric atoms, but it is
inconvenient with regular series of molecules like amino acids and simple sugars.
<p>
<em>Acknowledgement.</em> I thank Professor Ulrich Müller (Marburg, Germany) for pointing out that the term <q>asymmetric centre</q> introduced by
Cahn, Ingold and Prelog is illogical and self-contradictory, as the concept of a centre of symmetry only makes sense when there is symmetry. This and similar
terms have therefore been eliminated from this discussion.
<h2 class="framed">Textbook checklist</h2>
<div class="table">
<table>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="howler.htm#abeles">Abeles, Frey and Jencks</a></td>
<td valign="top"><img src="images/greenbal.gif" alt="OK" width="14" height="14" title="OK"></td>
<td valign="top">No problems noted</td>
<td valign="top">p. 41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="howler.htm#campbell">Campbell</a></td>
<td valign="top"><img src="images/yellowba.gif" alt="Poor" width="14" height="14" title="Partially incorrect"></td>
<td valign="top">Confused and partially inaccurate</td>
<td valign="top">pp. 69–70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="howler.htm#garrett">Garrett and Grisham</a></td>
<td valign="top"><img src="images/yellowba.gif" alt="Poor" width="14" height="14" title="Partially incorrect"></td>
<td valign="top">In general correct, but fails to appreciate reasons for retaining the <small>DL</small> system
for amino acids and carbohydrates.</td>
<td valign="top">pp. 70–73</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="howler.htm#horton">Horton <cite>et al.</cite></a></td>
<td valign="top"><img src="images/greenbal.gif" alt="OK" width="14" height="14" title="OK"></td>
<td valign="top">No problems noted</td>
<td valign="top">pp. 55–56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="howler.htm#lehninger">Lehninger, Nelson and Cox</a></td>
<td valign="top"><img src="images/greenbal.gif" alt="OK" width="14" height="14" title="OK"></td>
<td valign="top">No problems noted</td>
<td valign="top">pp. 112–113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="howler.htm#mckee">McKee and McKee</a></td>
<td valign="top"><img src="images/greenbal.gif" alt="OK" width="14" height="14" title="OK"></td>
<td valign="top">No problems noted</td>
<td valign="top">p. 79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="howler.htm#mathews">Mathews, van Holde and Ahern</a></td>
<td valign="top"><img src="images/yellowba.gif" alt="Poor" width="14" height="14" title="Partially incorrect"></td>
<td valign="top">Correct in main features, but incorrect reason given for preferring the <small>DL</small>
system for amino acids and sugars</td>
<td valign="top">pp. 129–132, 281</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="howler.htm#stryer">Stryer</a></td>
<td valign="top"><img src="images/greenbal.gif" alt="OK" width="14" height="14" title="OK"></td>
<td valign="top">Brief but correct</td>
<td valign="top">p. 19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="howler.htm#voet">Voet and Voet</a></td>
<td valign="top"><img src="images/greenbal.gif" alt="OK" width="14" height="14" title="OK"></td>
<td valign="top">Accurate and complete</td>
<td valign="top">pp. 62–66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="howler.htm#zubay">Zubay</a></td>
<td valign="top"><img src="images/greenbal.gif" alt="OK" width="14" height="14" title="OK"></td>
<td valign="top">No problems noted</td>
<td valign="top">pp. 53–54, 287</td>
</tr>
</table></div>
<hr>
<p><a href="howler.htm">Other common errors in textbooks</a>
<p><a href="howler.htm#boox">List of books considered</a>
<hr>
<div class="sidebar-tail">
<p class="in-tail">
Page created on 13 April 2000<br>
Last update: 22 December 2008<br>
Last significant update: 14 October 2005<br>
Comments and corrections to this page are welcome, and may be sent to <a href="mailto:acornish@ibsm.cnrs-mrs.fr">Athel Cornish-Bowden</a><br>
<a name="bottom"></a></div>
<p class="invisible"><a href="#top" accesskey="T"></a><a href="#bottom" accesskey="B"></a>
<a href="http://valet.webthing.com/page/validate?url=http://bip.cnrs-mrs.fr/bip10/stereo.htm&parser=Any&resultsMode=traditional&parseMode=web#l20" accesskey="V"> </a>
</body>
</html>